Glossy Buckthorn: A Thornless Wetland Invasion

Olivia Triltsch • January 9, 2025

History

Originating in Europe and Asia, glossy buckthorn is a non-native species brought to the United States in the mid-1800s. The Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health states translocation of this species occurred for ornamental landscaping and to create wildlife habitat and food. Unfortunately, this is a common occurrence for invasive plant species as they often offer unique colorations and patterns in gardens. 

Current Status 

Glossy Buckthorn is recognized by the Michigan DNR as an invasive species which spans across the Northeast and Midwest of the United States. The species commonly is found in moist soils of wetlands with sun exposure or along common transportation routes like roadsides and fence rows. The aggressive growth of this bushy species allows it to thrive on the land and outcompete native species, especially those that are shade intolerant. 

Conservation 

Glossy buckthorn threatens conservation efforts in wetland ecosystems due to its ability to host alfalfa mosaic virus, crown fungus, and potentially soybean aphid. These diseases can cause plant death resulting in decreased agricultural yield according to research done at Utah State University. With this plant impacting ecosystems and agriculture as an invasive species, increasing public awareness can be the first step in taking action. Additionally, this species can become densely populated prohibiting native species from receiving valuable resources like sunlight. Invasives like this spread through the mature seeds within the fruit, commonly by frugivorous (fruit-eating) birds. Additionally, small rodents may cache the fruit which can later lead to new plant growth when forgotten. Each of the berries contain three to four seeds which can remain viable for several years, further complicating eradication efforts. 

The Midwest Invasive Species Information Network (MISIN) created an interactive map beneficial in tracking the spread of this species and guiding conservation efforts. If recognized early into the invasion with the aid of maps like these, there is a possibility for eliminating the population using multiple methods of control. While the more obvious and aggressive approach may be cutting the top, this opens the door for sprouting and production of fruit within the same season according to the Michigan DNR. Furthermore, the USDA Forest Service recognizes the perseverance of glossy buckthorn after controlled fires and top killing creating the perfect storm for regeneration. Additionally, the preference to grow in an area with sunlight would prevail with this technique as the seedlings around mature plants would have a higher chance of propagation when the overstory is cleared. When considering the various control methods, an integrated pest management (IPM) approach should be taken for the best results using multiple methods from chemical to prescribed burns depending on local ecology. However, each control method often requires follow-up treatments due to how prolific this plant is.  

Mechanical Control 

When volunteers are plentiful and the infestation is not overwhelming, mechanical control methods may be a good choice for this plant. Younger plants in sandy soils may be easy to hand pull from the ground to remove the plant and roots. When mature plants are plentiful, it can become a greater challenge to remove the vegetation at the root. In this case, girdling can be useful to remove parts of the tree surface to interrupt nutrient flow. Furthermore, flooding can be a mode of control as glossy buckthorn has an affinity for moist soils, typically found in wetlands. When done correctly, flooding can restore historical ecological balance in the area limiting disruption to surrounding native plants. If mechanical control is the answer for your area, be conscious of disposal methods and ensure roots are dried and fruit is properly bagged to prevent further establishment. 


Chemical Control 

Alternatively, glossy buckthorn can be controlled through cutting combined with herbicide application. With this type of chemical control, it is important to understand the most effective time and type of treatment to minimize negative impacts for native species. Common methods of herbicidal control on this woody invasive include foliar application, cut-stump, girdling, basal bark, and injection; however, all chemical use should legally follow the label of each product. 

Characteristics 

The Michigan DNR classifies this species as a small tree or shrub reaching almost 18 feet tall with simple, untoothed, glossy leaves alternating either side of the stem or branch. Small, greenish-white flowers can be found in clusters throughout late spring and summer turning into dark purple, pea-sized fruits in late summer. Despite the name, the bush does not actually have any thorns. When cut, the inner bark has a distinctive orange hue that can aid in positive identification year-round. In the winter, this plant can be identified with the scaleless rust-colored buds in addition to the blotchy woody branches with lighter raised nodules. 

There can be several look-alikes for this species including other buckthorns and dogwoods. Common buckthorn can be distinguished due to characteristic finely toothed leaves with fewer veins in addition to flowers with four petals instead of five. Additionally, this species is truer to its namesake as there can be a thorn at the end of the branches. Alder-leaved buckthorn is a native species that is less than 3 feet tall with identifiable rounded teeth along the leaves. This native buckthorn also lacks flowers with petals. In contrast, dogwoods have similar leaves without teeth, however they are arranged in an opposite pattern. The blue to white fruit and flowers are clustered on red stems instead of at the branch. If leaves are present, the underside of a glossy buckthorn leaf is shiny whereas a dogwood leaf is not according to Michigan Tech Keweenaw Invasive Species Management Area (KISMA). 

Get Involved

To report invasive species in Michigan like glossy buckthorn, utilize the MISIN reporting tool online or in the app. If you want to contribute to the control of invasive species like glossy buckthorn in Michigan, consider joining MUCC at an On the Ground event. We will be at Gourdneck State Game Area in Portage this Saturday, January 18th for an invasive species removal starting at 9 am. We look forward to seeing you there! 

Recent Posts

By Justin Tomei October 9, 2025
The Natural Resources Commission met today, Thursday, October 9th for their October meeting. The commission reaffirmed its intent to allow for lethal year-round coyote management on public and private land via a unanimously passed resolution before passing fisheries orders, and tabling more for consideration in November. The commission passed Fisheries Orders 210.26 , and 254.25 before tabling 206.26, 219.26 , and 253.26 . Commissioner John Walters provided an amendment to the fisheries order to expand underwater spearfishing opportunities to most of the Great Lakes, allowing for some spatial closures for the protection of particularly sensitive areas. The commission took steps to make good on their promise to allow year-round coyote management, unanimously passing a resolution more clearly stating their intent and what the pending wildlife conservation order will look like. The next meeting is Thursday November 6 in Lansing.
By Justin Tomei October 7, 2025
The Michigan Natural Resources Commission (NRC) will convene for its October meeting on Thursday, October 9, 2025, at Michigan Technological University’s Rozsa Center for the Performing Arts in Houghton, MI. This monthly gathering brings together commissioners, Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff, and the public to discuss policy decisions and updates impacting the state’s natural resources, wildlife, and outdoor recreation opportunities. The meeting will begin with Coffee with Commissioners from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m., followed by the formal session at 9:30 a.m. Attendees can park for free in Lot 10, located east of the Rozsa Center. The meeting will open with a presentation from DNR leadership, including several notable updates and informational reports: Spring Turkey Regulations: Wildlife Division staff will present proposed changes to spring turkey hunting regulations for 2026. Wildlife Habitat Grants : Program leads will outline new habitat grant initiatives and highlight ongoing restoration efforts across the state. Moose Population Monitoring: A presentation will cover results from the most recent moose survey and discuss ecological and environmental factors limiting population growth. White-Nose Syndrome: The Wildlife Division will provide the latest data on the spread and impact of white-nose syndrome on Michigan’s bat populations. New Business The commission will consider a range of new proposals and action items, including: Oil and Gas Lease Auction: Approval for a proposed October 21, 2025, lease auction for energy development on state-managed lands. Land Transactions: Consideration of multiple land sales, acquisitions, and donations, including parcels in Tuscola, Wayne, St. Clair, and Luce counties. Wildlife Orders: Review of spring turkey regulations for the 2026 hunting season . Old Business The NRC will also revisit several regulatory items from previous meetings, including proposed amendments to a number of Fisheries Orders. This includes an amendment further expanding underwater spearfishing to larger portions of the Great Lakes. All orders and amendments for consideration can be found at the NRC agenda, HERE .
By Justin Tomei October 3, 2025
Early Friday, morning, the Michigan Legislature approved a budget for the 2026 fiscal year. The two chambers and the governor agreed to a deal earlier this week and passed a stopgap to keep the state government open while work on the omnibus bill was finalized. The DNR budget is highlighted by some minor cuts, and new boilerplate language: No license fee increases were included No recreation passport opt-out was included Nature awaits program was removed as an on-going program Reduces 4.0 FTE positions for Fish Production and 15.0 FTE positions for Fisheries Resource Management Reduces 20.0 FTE positions and $200,000 for Wildlife Management Reduces invasive species prevention and control by $1.2 million Appropriates $2.8 million GF/GP (one-time) for fish production and stocking in Great Lakes and inland fisheries Reduces wetland restoration, enhancement, and acquisition funding by $1 million. In-person work prioritization New DNR scorecard and reporting requirements Prohibition on utility scale solar and wind projects on public lands An authorization to increase restricted fund appropriations if a license fee bill is passed The House Fiscal Analysis of the budget can be found HERE . To ensure our natural resources remain protected and managed thoughtfully, and our outdoor heritage defended, join Michigan United Conservation Clubs today: http://bit.ly/JoinMUCC .
More Posts