The announcement of a counter-proposal to the National Guard’s request for leasing an additional 162,000 acres has left some with more questions than answers.
On April 21, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the National Guard. A week later, the DNR announced that it rejected the 162,000-acre lease the Guard had initially requested.
Michigan United Conservation Clubs was the first organization to oppose the expansion request and released this last week (click here) . In the release last week, executive director Amy Trotter said the announcement that the National Guard could utilize up to 52,000 new acres of land still has MUCC on guard.
“The memorandum of understanding falls more in line with traditional land-use practices by entities other than the government,” Trotter said. “We expect transparency and the protection of our natural resources to preface any and all conversations surrounding the militarization of our public lands.”
Once the land use permit request is filed for specific parcels of lands and dates, the National Guard may be required to complete an environmental impact statement per the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The costs of that statement are the responsibility of the entity applying for that permit.
Environmental impact studies under the authority of NEPA generally require some form of public comment, usually this is between 30-45 days.
The MOU lays out two main objectives agreed to between the parties: to establish the sideboards for state land use permits by the National Guard on tax-reverted lands (more on this later) and to provide for the protection of and access to Michigan’s public land and natural resources.
According to the MOU (click here to read in its entirety) :
According to the MOU, the purpose of the land use permits is:
The following activities WILL NOT be permitted:
While 52,000 acres of land and 365 days of the year may be available, Trotter said it’s important to note that approval of a single land use permit of that magnitude is unprecedented. The land use permit application is almost certain to be more specific to targeted times of the year and specific areas of land.
She said MUCC’s opposition from the beginning has been founded in three areas: wildlife, habitat and access.
“This MOU ensures that any land use permit application from the National Guard will be subject to important terms: public access will remain open and damage to habitat will be mitigated. We will hold accountable our DNR that any new training techniques or technologies will not negatively impact wildlife — that is our job and duty to our members.”
The lands selected as available for land use permits by the National Guard are tax-reverted. Lands purchased using fish and game dollars or Pittman-Robertson dollars will not be considered for land use permits, according to the MOU.
The post What does the DNR and National Guard’s Camp Grayling agreement really mean? appeared first on Michigan United Conservation Clubs.
P: 517.371.1041
Michigan United Conservation Clubs, a 501c3
nonprofit conservation organization
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 38-0831862
2101 Wood St, Lansing MI 48912
2025 © Copyright | All Rights Reserved | Michigan United Conservation Clubs
Website powered by Neon One