AG Nessel: Wolves should be placed back on the endangered species list

lschultz • July 28, 2021

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel submitted a brief to a California court Monday asking that wolves be placed back on the endangered species list.

The brief is part of an ongoing legal case against the delisting and contradicts the administration’s stance as presented by public and written comments from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) . The Michigan DNR is currently moving forward with scheduling Wolf Management Advisory Council meetings and sending out public attitude surveys.

Nessel, a known anti-hunting sympathizer, also received campaign contributions and an endorsement from the Humane Society Legislative Fund  (an affiliated organization of the Humane Society of the United States) — the same organization that has repeatedly called all legal and ethical hunters trophy hunters. The attorney general is an independently elected position.

 HSUS, along with the Detroit Zoological Society and Detroit Audubon Society, led the 2014 “Keep Michigan Wolves Protected” ballot referendum that opposed naming wolves a game species or allowing the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) to name new game species based on scientific recommendations. 

In the brief, Nessel and attorneys working on her behalf repeatedly recognize that the Great Lakes population of gray wolves is recovered —  a stark contrast to the argument HSUS and other anti-hunting advocates make each month at NRC meetings.

What’s troubling is that Michigan’s attorney general, on the taxpayers’ dime and on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, is submitting briefs on an issue in direct conflict with the state biologists’ data. If the wolf population has recovered here, as according to Nessel’s brief, why is the attorney general worried about wolf populations in other states, MUCC Executive Director Amy Trotter said. 

“AG Nessel’s time and effort is misplaced. Considering our wolf population is recovered and the state is actively updating the wolf management plan, the brief is moot,” Trotter said. “Instead, seeing the AG focus more of her energy on Michigan-specific cases that would enhance rather than hamper our efforts here in Michigan seems like a better use of taxpayer dollars.”

Trotter is one of five representatives from stakeholder groups to be selected for the Wolf Management Advisory Council. She was appointed to represent conservation organizations. The others include Mike Thorman (Michigan Hunting Dog Federation) representing hunting organizations, Bee Friedlander (Attorneys for Animals) representing an animal advocacy organization, Dick Pershinske (Upper Peninsula resident) representing agricultural interests and Miles Falck (Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission) representing tribal government.

The council’s charge will be to make recommendations to the DNR regarding the management of gray wolves in Michigan. 

In 2020, the Trump administration delisted gray wolves in the lower 48 states — effectively handing management of the species back to the states when the final rule took effect on January 4, 2021. The announcement triggered lawsuits from anti-hunting groups almost immediately. 

One lawsuit, filed in Oakland County by the 06 Legacy and Karol Miller, that specifically named MUCC and claimed the organization did not represent conservation interests was dismissed on July 21.

Trotter has been down this road before, and it is an issue she has worked fervently on since her first day with MUCC, she said.

“MUCC has advocated for a durable wolf delisting, long-term management goals and the use of hunting and trapping as a primary management tool for almost a decade,” Trotter said. “This constant merry-go-round of listing and delisting does a disservice to the species, the state’s ability to manage that species and the best available science surrounding Michigan’s recovered wolf population.”

Since 1937, MUCC has united citizens to conserve, protect and enhance Michigan’s natural resources and outdoor heritage – and we do so from Lansing to Washington D.C. Please consider joining us today as we advocate for a durable, long-term management solution for gray wolves in Michigan: http://bit.ly/JoinMUCC.

Recent Posts

From the Field to the Sky: What Fireworks Mean for Wildlife

By Olivia Triltsch • July 3, 2025
The United States is not shy about using big, beautiful fireworks in celebration of many occasions. July 4th is a day of celebration for many within the country, celebrating the country’s independence from Great Britain in 1776. Fireworks and barbecues are the most common modes of celebration on this day in recognition of the historic significance of the day. While these grand displays are something many look forward to each year, it is important to consider the impacts these explosions have on the surrounding area, including pets and wildlife.

MUCC Submits Public Comment in Support of Line 5 Tunnel Project

By Justin Tomei • June 30, 2025
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MUCC Submits Public Comment in Support of Line 5 Tunnel Project Lansing, MI — Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC), the nation’s largest statewide conservation organization, has submitted formal public comments urging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to approve the Enbridge Line 5 Tunnel Project. In a letter submitted today, MUCC emphasized the need to move this critical infrastructure forward to protect the Great Lakes while maintaining safe, reliable energy transportation. “MUCC supports the tunnel project as the best available alternative to reduce the risk of an environmental disaster in the Straits of Mackinac while continuing to deliver essential energy products to Michigan families and industries,” said Amy Trotter, CEO of MUCC. “We believe the tunnel project strikes a balance between protecting the environment and maintaining energy security.” MUCC’s position is backed by a formal resolution passed by its membership, which includes thousands of hunters, anglers, trappers, and outdoor enthusiasts across Michigan. The resolution supports the tunnel as a long-term solution that replaces the aging and exposed pipeline segment currently crossing the Straits, offering greater environmental safeguards through secondary containment. The organization cited the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which acknowledges the tunnel’s benefits, including reduced spill risk and a controlled, buried environment for transporting light crude oil and natural gas liquids. MUCC also rejected the "no action alternative," which would allow the existing line to remain in operation without any new protective infrastructure. “Other alternatives, like transporting fuel by truck or rail, are inefficient and carry greater environmental and safety risks,” Trotter added. “Allowing the current line to operate exposed on the lakebed indefinitely is simply not acceptable.” MUCC’s comment stresses that the organization is not weighing in on the type of energy transported, but rather on the environmental risks and safety benefits of the tunnel itself. Originally approved by the Michigan legislature and governor in 2018, the Great Lakes Tunnel Project represents a once-in-a-generation investment in infrastructure and environmental protection. MUCC urges the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to issue the necessary permits and move forward with construction without further delay. For Media Contact: Justin Tomei jtomei@mucc.org 517-346-6488 #####

Michigan Wildlife Conservation Month: MUCC's Impact

By Olivia Triltsch • June 26, 2025
Since its inception, MUCC has made great strides in the conservation of natural resources through advocacy, habitat, youth education, and communications.
More Posts