Michigan DNR skirting Proposal G, citing previous statute

lschultz • July 6, 2022

The intent of one of Michigan’s most sacred conservation victories is being challenged by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Proposal G of 1996 was a legislatively referred referendum passed by about 69 percent of Michigan voters. It granted the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) exclusive authority over the taking of game and requires the commission, “to the greatest extent practicable, to use principles of sound scientific management in making decisions regarding the taking of game.”

The Natural Resources Commission is a seven-member, bipartisan body appointed by the governor. Prior to 2010, the commission was responsible for hiring the DNR director — a duty that now resides with the governor.

In February 2022, Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC) learned that the DNR had provided NRC commissioners with a document titled What Tools Are Available and Who Has the Authority? This document outlined what DNR Director Dan Eichinger and the administration feel the authorities are of the NRC, legislature and director, separately.

Citing MCL 324.40107 (in statute prior to Proposal G), Eichinger has asserted department authority over the establishment of hunting seasons (subsequent to the first season established by the NRC), quotas and geographic boundaries.

It is important to note that fisheries issues are exclusively under the authority of the NRC as a result of the 2014 Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act.

MUCC and the conservation community assumed the intent of Proposal G of 1996 was for the NRC to have authority over matters like boundaries, quotas and seasons, said Amy Trotter, MUCC executive director.

“MUCC was founded to keep politics out of our conservation and natural resources management,” Trotter said. “An independent and transparent commission structure is the best tool we have to insulate these decisions from the whims of politicians and their political agendas.”

 Why does it matter?

At a basic level, MUCC feels that the seven-member, bipartisan NRC is a better choice for complex, sometimes charged, issues, Trotter said.

“Given that the director is a single political appointment of the governor, there are huge implications allowing that person to control hunting seasons, quotas and hunting areas in a vacuum,” Trotter said. “Our hope is to work with the director or legislature to codify Proposal G’s intent for all Michigan conservationists that worked so hard to pass it.”

The director’s sole discretion over the establishment of hunting seasons could have far-reaching impacts for species such as sandhill cranes, which are not yet named a game species, or wolves, which are named a game species. Establishing a hunting season for wolves would fall under the director’s purview because it would not be the “first open season for a new game species,” according to the DNR’s interpretation.

The DNR director establishing quotas and geographic areas allows circumvention, essentially, of seasons if the director so chooses. By setting quotas and areas, the director could determine where hunting is allowed and not allowed in Michigan.

MUCC is not only concerned about management decisions today but in the future, too, Trotter said.

“The processes we use today will only have compounding effects on our natural resources down the line as director appointments and sentiment towards hunting change,” Trotter said. “Ensuring that natural resources management decisions are not made unilaterally and that they are insulated from politics was a founding principle of MUCC. It will continue to remain at the forefront of who we are.”

What’s next?

An MUCC emergency resolution was written by Mindy Koch, former DNR deputy director and current president of the Michigan Resource Stewards, and passed by the MUCC Executive Board on April 13. MUCC announced its concerns to the DNR and the director formally on April 14.

“Presently, the commission and department are working together to further clarify some of those questions and are doing so in conjunction with the attorney general’s office,” the department sent in response.

At the 2022 MUCC Annual Convention, members voted unanimously in support of the resolution , directing MUCC staff to “take action to ensure Proposal G’s original intent is upheld.”

The department was reached for comment on July 6, but it said the turnaround time for approvals on a quote was too quick.

MUCC has heard nothing further on the matter, and the commission has been operating similarly to how it did before the interpretation was made known. 

Personal communications with former DNR executive office staff have shed light on knowledge of the former statute, but they felt it was in their best interest to work directly with commissioners to resolve differences rather than trying to override them. It is unclear why this administration chose to more publicly assert its authority.

MUCC will be watching closely and communicating with the NRC to ensure this continues until a collaborative discussion about necessary legislative updates can take place. 

July NRC Meeting

The agenda for the July NRC meeting can be found here. There are no new action items up for consideration.

The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 14 at 9  a.m at Lansing Community College West Campus, Rooms M119-121. 

A handful of land transactions appear on the agenda, MUCC only reviews land transactions exceeding 80 acres, of which there is one this month. Land Transaction Two is an acquisition of 80 acres in Chippewa County and is currently bordered on three sides by state land. MUCC supports this transaction.

MUCC will be live streaming the meeting on our Facebook page .

If you would like to sign up for public comment, please email NRC Executive Assistant Victoria Lischalk at NRC@michigan.gov

To ensure our natural resources remain protected and managed thoughtfully in perpetuity, join Michigan United Conservation Clubs today: http://bit.ly/JoinMUCC

 

Recent Posts

By Olivia Triltsch October 23, 2025
Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC) is proud to announce a new partnership with the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) to bring the Certified Wildlife Habitat ™ program to communities across Michigan. This collaboration connects MUCC’s long-standing commitment to conservation with NWF’s national effort to create, restore, and certify habitats that provide food, water, cover, and places to raise young. Together, the organizations aim to inspire individuals, schools, and communities to take action in their own backyards to support native species. Through this initiative, MUCC will help expand awareness of the Certified Wildlife Habitat program, integrate it into its volunteer network, and provide resources to landowners interested in enhancing habitat on their property. One of the greatest benefits for volunteers comes from the knowledge gained in understanding wildlife habitat enhancement, allowing for the application to private land habitat enhancement. In addition to this, much of the work we do for habitat can apply to a variety of species, from rabbits to wood ducks, even birds of prey. The partnership will also promote community engagement opportunities through educational events, workshops, and collaborative restoration projects. In coordination with efforts like the certified wildlife habitat, MUCC hopes to expand conservation efforts across Michigan. Our award-winning, statewide volunteer habitat program, On the Ground (OTG), works to conserve, protect, and enhance wildlife habitat. In 2025 alone, OTG worked with 739 volunteers across 27 habitat projects, from invasive species removal to river clean-ups. Through the hard work contributing over 2,900 volunteer hours, habitat stewards were able to improve 423 acres of land for wildlife conservation in Michigan. Although OTG projects are not active year-round, we encourage Michigan residents to continue land stewardship on both public and private lands. To qualify for certification through the Certified Wildlife Habitat program, a property must include: Three natural food sources One water source Two places for shelter Two places to raise young Two sustainable practices To determine if your habitat qualifies, visit the NWF website and take the habitat quiz or download the checklist. If your habitat needs native plants, check out Garden for Wildlife to find species native to your area. The $25 application fee includes a personalized paper certificate, a 1-year NWF membership, and the option to purchase lawn plaques and garden flags. Habitats located on school grounds do not have a fee to get certified, so check to see what you might need to qualify today. If you are interested in joining our On the Ground program for the 2026 season, stay connected through our Facebook , Instagram , and OTG webpage for upcoming events.
By Olivia Triltsch October 16, 2025
In 2025, the On the Ground program conducted 8 junior projects with schools involving 316 students from across the state. From tree plantings to invasive species removal, these students worked to enhance 39.3 acres of public land after contributing over 200 volunteer hours. Visit our website to learn more information about our On the Ground program and On the Ground Junior . To wrap up the 2025 field season, the On the Ground program worked with two classrooms to enhance wildlife habitat and recreational access. Junior programs like these allow teachers to get their students out of the classroom and into hands-on learning about the importance of habitat work while meeting individuals in the field.
By Justin Tomei October 9, 2025
The Natural Resources Commission met today, Thursday, October 9th for their October meeting. The commission reaffirmed its intent to allow for lethal year-round coyote management on public and private land via a unanimously passed resolution before passing fisheries orders, and tabling more for consideration in November. The commission passed Fisheries Orders 210.26 , and 254.25 before tabling 206.26, 219.26 , and 253.26 . Commissioner John Walters provided an amendment to the fisheries order to expand underwater spearfishing opportunities to most of the Great Lakes, allowing for some spatial closures for the protection of particularly sensitive areas. The commission took steps to make good on their promise to allow year-round coyote management, unanimously passing a resolution more clearly stating their intent and what the pending wildlife conservation order will look like. The next meeting is Thursday November 6 in Lansing.
More Posts